The death of Trayvon Martin at the hands of a member of a local neighborhood watch program is a tragedy regardless of the circumstances. Being a responsible citizen who essentially writes political commentary as a hobby and can in no way be associated with the professional journalists of the main stream media, (thank God) I will not condemn or defend anyone involved, basically because I don’t have all the details, have not interviewed witnesses or the police who investigated the matter and am content to wait for the local officials to complete their investigation.
Barrack (He whose middle name may not be mentioned) Obama, also known as President of the United States should realize what a mistake it is to comment before all the facts have been gathered. Clearly he has forgotten the lessons learned at the beer summit, and has chosen once again to comment before having all the facts. President Obama believes that if he had a son he would look like Trayvon Martin. I think his son would be skinnier with bigger ears but I didn’t attend Harvard law so what do I know. President Obama has suggested that this is a situation that requires all of us to do a little soul searching, the implication being that we are all a little guilty of creating an environment where a seventeen year old kid, involved in an altercation with the local neighborhood watchman is not safe.
Having never been part of a neighborhood watch program I decided that I had no reason to search my soul and instead chose to wonder why of all the tragic deaths that have occurred since his election does he feel the need to comment on this one. I have concluded that since he did not take part in the civil rights movement and has been accused of not being authentic enough, he is attempting to make up for it by inserting himself into situations where the White House has no real need to be.
When full time charlatans like Al Sharpton, practice this type of race baiting its more annoying than offensive. No one who remembers the Tawanna Brawley case gives any credit to anything which spills from Reverend Sharptons mouth, but when the White House, and members of Congress use the death of a young man as a means to a political ends that is just despicable.
In 2010 several Congressmen staged a provocative march through a crowd of protestors. Pelosi and several of her henchmen were certain they would get at least one racial slur from what they characterized as an angry mob. However in spite of all the cameras and microphones present no evidence of racism or any other bad behavior was found, at least not on the part of the protestors. Our elected representatives however would not allow something as trivial as a lack of evidence deter them from making irresponsible and offensive allegations, one congressman even claimed to have been spit on. Yet to date, and in spite of the offer of a generous cash reward, no evidence to support the claim has been offered.
The President of the United States and members of Congress are using Trayvon Martin as the smoking gun, or “spittle” that was never produced back in 2010, to prove that the United States is a hateful, racist and intolerant country, and creating an atmosphere of racial unrest to draw attention away from their own failures. With his signature health care legislation circling the drain at the Supreme Court and his economic stimulus effort having been shown to be a complete failure while his continued effort to bankroll a green energy movement using the taxpayer’s money has resulted in one embarrassment after another, Obama and the democrats need a distraction.
To Obama and the democrat members of congress Trayvon Martin is nothing more than political sleight of hand, a badly needed illusion to replace the recent war on women, which lasted about as long as a twelve pack of condoms in Sandra Fluke’s dorm room. The fact that the Obama administration has nothing to campaign on is pretty sad when you consider that for his first two years in office he essentially controlled the Federal government, if he had chosen to do so he could have turned the United States into a liberal wasteland from sea to shining sea, but he didn’t, for the same reason the democrat controlled Senate has refused to pass a budget since Obama took office. Despite all of their passionately espoused liberal views the democrats from Barrack Obama right down to the most junior democrat member of congress hold one desire dearer than all others, the desire to be reelected.
The War on Motherhood
The democrats in their never ending quest to offend honest American values in whatever form they might take have put motherhood in their crosshairs. Hillary Rosen a democrat political operative and adviser to the President of the United States stated publicly that Ann Romney wife of GOP primary hopeful Mitt Romney has never worked a day in her life. Ann Romney a woman who battled cancer and MS, while raising five children to be fine young adults, in the liberal mindset has never worked.
Much of the conservative media in their effort to one up the liberal media have begun calling this latest democrat assault on all things decent “Obama’s war on women”. They are wrong. Obama and the rest of the liberal horde do not have a problem with women and they certainly don’t want a war with them. Women vote and assuming they have been indoctrinated into the right victims group they vote democrat. Women are important to the liberal cause, where would the original Republican war on women be if Sandra Fluke hadn’t been there to trot out and whine to the nation about the cost of managing her sex life. Democrats love women, remember Bill Clinton prominent democrat and former President of the United States, who loved women more than Bill Clinton? Sure, he didn’t love all women, but he loved as many as he could.
Gloria Steinem liberal democrat and well known radical feminist once said that women were in more danger at home than on the streets and that many women were just a man away from welfare, so basically they aren’t safe at home because there is a man there and without the man they’re only hope is the kindness of the taxpaying public, many of which are men. Liberals especially radical feminist liberals think there is something offensive about a woman choosing to be a wife and mother; they seem to feel as though motherhood isn’t important unless you have the right kind of career to validate the decision to have kids. This is the kind of thinking that is shaping the minds of the next generation of deadbeat parents.
Personally I am a firm believer in the pursuit of happiness; have kids, have a career, have both. What I don’t understand is what democrats have against motherhood. What could anyone ever do whether they are a man or a woman that could possibly be more important than raising children to become responsible and productive adults. Perhaps that’s the answer, responsible and productive adults aren’t victims and generally have no use for the democrat party and the nanny state. Could it be this unwarranted assault on mothers is just an end run attack on the much maligned and despised American family?
For more than a generation the liberals in academia, the media and especially within the democrat party, have worked to devalue the role of family and especially mothers in our society, is it any wonder so many people are dependent on the government to provide them with the basic necessities of life, isn’t the occupy movement really just a bunch of whiney babies looking to replace the mommy they never had, someone to feed them, clothe them, provide them with free education and healthcare and maybe tuck them in at night.
Our creator in his infinite wisdom endowed each of us at birth with an inalienable right to life liberty and the pursuit of happiness, for everything else he gave us mothers.