The media, the so called fourth estate; print and broadcast journalists, writers of television and movie scripts, ad and marketing people, an entire industry in which nine out of ten people vote democrat and identify with liberal policies and ideals.
On a recent episode of what I am told is a fairly popular sitcom a toddler drops an F*** bomb as a means of entertaining their viewing audience. A luxury car manufacturer (Mercedes) is currently using the image of a notorious mass murder and psychopath Che Guevara to sell automobiles to a public they consider too stupid to know who and what he is. Late night comedians and talk show hosts continue to use the family of former Vice Presidential candidate and Governor of Alaska, Sarah Palin as fodder for their sad brand of liberal comedy and investigative journalists who actually investigate Democrat candidates are about as common as verifiable Loch Ness Monster sightings. Are these really the people we want to rely on to choose our Presidential candidate?
The media says that Herman Cain is a womanizer and a misogynist and we withdraw our support, they say Michelle Bachman is unelectable and we withdraw our support, they claim Newt Gingrich has to much baggage to win and we withdraw our support, then they tell us Mitt Romney is the guy their worried about and we trip over each other in a mad rush to vote for him. Republicans are behaving like the stupid sheep that liberals believe most Americans to be. Why in the name of logic and reason would we rely on people who think a two year old saying F*** on prime time TV is cute to guide us in making an informed choice about anything let alone our candidate for president. I am not saying that Romney is the wrong guy or that any of the other candidates are the right one, what I am saying is that we have to stop allowing the media to influence our choice.
Lately there has been a lot of criticism of Barack Obama in the media and many people point to this as the beginning of the end; it’s not, it’s just the beginning of their end game. The media is simply laying the ground work necessary for a miraculous rebound by candidate Obama as the actual election draws near. Once the GOP candidate is chosen you will see a tidal wave of stories about economic improvement and declining unemployment and the criticism today merely makes the phony stories of tomorrow seem credible, especially to a public willing to buy high priced automobiles being sold by Che Guevara.
The guy in a tinfoil hat claiming he just saw Elvis having lunch with big foot has at least as much credibility as most journalists. When the once great Dan Rather claimed he had the goods on President Bush no amount of hard evidence could stop him from presenting his counterfeit documents as genuine, and even when the network decided they couldn’t continue to support his story he continued to claim that even though his documents might be fake no one was denying the underlying facts. Why should anyone have to deny the underlying “facts” supported by phony documents? In my view every story Dan Rather ever worked on, particularly the ones involving Republican office holders should be called into question.
The media claims to be able to present news in a fair and balance manner, and they probably can; if the story is a burning building and the only ones hurt are greedy Republican capitalists. The media will always view political events through the distorted filter provided by their college professors; Republicans lie, Democrats misspeak, Republicans steal, Democrats commit minor administrative errors. When the media interviews a Republican they ask questions about foreign affairs in remote backwater countries, when they interview Democrats they ask them tough questions like; how great is it to be you?
Barrack Obama has been an absolute disaster as President and nothing is more important than sending him home. We the people; using the power of the ballot box, have the power to change the course of our countries future, but with this power comes an awesome responsibility. We must decide who we are as a people. Are we the descendants of pioneers and trail blazers ready and willing to take on the world and make the best life that we can for ourselves or are we victims and whiners preferring to rely on whatever safety net our government is able to provide.
Being a liberal means never having to say you’re responsible
During the administration of President George W. Bush a handful of soldiers were foundto be mistreating war prisoners at the Abu Ghraib prison in Baghdad, Iraq. The media;being very sensitive to this sort of thing, since apparently most of them were teased relentlessly in High School, immediately accused President Bush and his administration of war crimes and demanded an investigation. The recent incident involving a small group of U.S. Marines urinating on dead Taliban terrorists brought a wholesale indictment of American armed forces but no effort to lay responsibility at the feet of Barack Obama or his administration, and of course there was no effort on the part of the Obama administration to accept responsibility for the actions of soldiers under his command.
Urinating on anyone living or dead is in exceptionally poor taste unless it’s at a Chris Dodd or Barney Frank fundraiser and the responsible individuals should be harshly reprimanded; the incident did not however deserve the firestorm of media attention it received. Was it an embarrassment to our armed services? Yes it was, but on a par with the way a U.S. Congressman (liberal democrat) sending inappropriate pictures of himself to teenage girls is an embarrassment to the House of Representatives. We didn’t indict the entire system for the bad behavior of one pervert and we shouldn’t be doing it now.
Democrat administrations get credit when things go according to plan, but none of the blame when things go wrong. Republican administrations are just the opposite, when the department of labor or any other agency announces a program which the media sees as beneficial to their causes they give credit to the agency never the republican administration; Obama’s administration gets credit if the National Weather Service is right two days in a row.
During the so called Arab Spring when people all across the middle east began protesting the abuses of their governments and demanding more personal liberty, the Obama administration was quick to accept credit for laying the groundwork, claiming that the whirlwind apology tour our president embarked on early in his administration had emboldened people and given them hope, but there is very little chance that he will either accept responsibility for the resulting collapse of relatively stable governments and the ensuing chaos that springs up out of the ashes as militant groups like Hamas and the Muslim Brotherhood vie for power. Obama was quick to order our military to intervene in Libya and happy to accept credit for the downfall of the Libyan strongman Muammar Gadaffi, but where is he on the efforts of the Syrian people to bring down their totalitarian government, will he be held responsible for the continued human rights abuses of the Syrian government or the deaths of innocent people caught up in a situation not of their own making, why Libya but not Syria?
The Solyndra corporation was given half a billion dollars of the tax payers money to advance the kind of bankrupt thinking that Obama believes is key to Americas economic future. Not one job was created, our money is gone, (That’s right I said our money!) and all questions to determine what happened to it have been met with stonewalling and Fifth Amendment pleas. The taxpaying public deserves to know what happened to their money and Obama claims the republican investigation is going too far and interfering with his administration’s ability to govern. When they say interfering with their ability to govern you should read that as interfering with their ability to spend our money on things that will help his reelection effort. Where is the media outrage and the demand for accountability that accompanies everything a republican administration does?
The Obama administration has been an overwhelming failure and yet there has been very little effort by the media to hold him responsible for any of his mistakes. Thousands of jobs were sacrificed on the altar of environmentalism when the keystone pipeline deal was killed and Obama doesn’t accept any responsibility for it, he says it was the decision of the state department; could it be he doesn’t know that the state department works for him?
Liberals could solve a lot of problems if they worked as hard at finding real solutions as they do at ducking responsibility, so I suggest they take the path of least resistance, if they really want to avoid responsibility the smart move would be; don’t run for office, of course how often do liberals do the smart thing?